visionfoki.blogg.se

There’s no planning or anything and the teams are assigned to you during each chapter so you can have any combination of the three. The fire team is meant to suppress enemies, the assault team specializes in charging at suppressed enemies, and every now and then you can command a tank to assist you in battle. These are considered tactical shooters where you can command a squad of up to two teams. It’s obvious the developers were trying to do something different than many similar games of the time but the writing leaves a lot to be desired.īoth games are pretty much identical in terms of gameplay. Baker and Hartsock give these brief monologues before most chapters which I believe is intended to make these characters feel real and human, with the idea that you would be able to care about what they’re going through. With the voice acting as shoddy as it is, it was even harder for me to care about any of the characters. But the problem is that Band of Brothers is a true story about real soldiers and these games are about fictional soldiers and the writing here just isn’t on the same level. I mean the jump over Normandy sequence in Road to Hill 30 feels almost ripped straight out of Band of Brothers.

I think the developers were trying to mimic the storytelling and character development of this popular television series in these games. Now I’m a huge fan of Band of Brothers and watch it frequently. The voice acting can sound awkward at times and more often than not the conversations don’t sound like they have a normal flow to them. Maybe they were coached like “shout this line” and “whisper that line” but whatever happened, the end result is just a mess. It just sounds like the actors weren’t playing off each other’s emotions. I don’t know the standard for the voice acting process in video games but it sounds like each actor recorded their lines individually making almost every conversation between the soldiers sound odd.

About halfway through the game the story will proceed from where the first game left off. You’ll encounter many of the same soldiers and even fight through some of the same battles of the first game, albeit with different objectives. Apparently, the game is based on the historical Mission Albany and you play through true missions of the 101st Airborne.īrothers in Arms: Earned in Blood is essentially the same story told from the perspective of another soldier in Baker’s squad, Sergeant Joe “Red” Hartsock. After teaming up with the other members of your squad, you and your squad members fight your way to Hill 30, the historic location of the Battle of the Bloody Gulch. In Road to Hill 30 you play as Sergeant Matt Baker and after your plane is hit by anti-aircraft fire, you jump from the plane over Normandy and lose your kit in the drop. Many players consider these games to be two of the best World War II shooters ever released.īoth games are based on true events of the 502nd Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne Division.

These are considered tactical shooters and have a heavier focus on story and characters compared to similar games of the time. But these were not your typical World War II shooters. In March of 2005 Gearbox Software released Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 for Xbox and PC and it was followed by a sequel, Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood, released in October of that same year. Medal of Honor games were releasing left and right and Call of Duty was soon to follow. Anyone who was around in the late 90’s and early 2000’s should remember when World War II shooters dominated the first-person shooter market.